Can Sleep Tracking Cause Anxiety? The Orthosomnia Problem

Can Sleep Tracking Cause Anxiety? The Orthosomnia Problem

You wake up after what feels like a solid, uninterrupted night’s rest. You’re ready to tackle the day. Then, you glance at your wrist or reach for your phone. Your sleep tracker delivers its verdict: a low score, insufficient deep sleep, or too many awakenings. Instantly, that feeling of morning freshness evaporates, replaced by a nagging worry. Was my sleep really that bad? What did I do wrong? How can I fix it tonight?

This daily ritual is shared by millions. Approximately one in three American adults now uses a wearable device to collect health data, with sleep tracking being one of the most sought-after features. In a 2023 survey, over a third of Americans reported using an electronic device to monitor their sleep. The promise is alluring: quantified self-knowledge, a path to optimized rest, and control over a fundamental pillar of health.

Yet, a growing chorus of sleep specialists, psychologists, and researchers is identifying a troubling side effect. This quest for perfect sleep, guided by the sometimes-erratic oracle of consumer technology, is spawning a new wave of sleep-related anxiety. It has a name: orthosomnia.

Coined by researchers in 2017, the term "orthosomnia" describes an obsessive pursuit of optimal sleep that is driven by sleep tracker data. The name is tellingly derived from "ortho" (meaning correct or straight) and "somnia" (sleep), drawing a direct parallel to orthorexia, an unhealthy fixation with "correct" or "pure" eating. The core of the problem isn't the desire for good sleep—that's universal—but the transfer of authority from your own lived experience to the metrics on a screen.

This article is an exploration of this modern paradox. We will delve into how tools designed to improve wellness can inadvertently undermine it, creating a cycle of anxiety, obsession, and ironically, worse sleep. We will examine the science behind sleep tracking accuracy, the psychology of the "perfect sleep score," and the bidirectional relationship between sleep and anxiety that these devices can exacerbate. Finally, we will chart a path forward—how to use technology as a supportive tool rather than a punitive judge, and how to reclaim a peaceful relationship with sleep itself.

The central question we must confront is not whether sleep is important—it unequivocally is—but whether in our data-driven pursuit of it, we are sacrificing the very tranquility required to achieve it.

The Rise of the Quantified Sleeper: How Tracking Became a Nightly Ritual

The journey to bedside sleep tracking is a story of technological convergence, cultural shifts, and a growing public health focus on sleep's critical role. To understand orthosomnia, we must first understand how we arrived at a point where checking a sleep score is as routine as checking the weather.

From Clinic to Wrist: The Democratization of Sleep Data

For decades, detailed sleep analysis was confined to the sleep laboratory. The gold-standard test, polysomnography (PSG), involves attaching a maze of electrodes to the scalp, face, and body to monitor brain waves, eye movement, muscle activity, heart rhythm, and breathing. It’s comprehensive, medically invaluable, and highly intrusive.

The breakthrough for consumers came with the miniaturization of sensors and the rise of the "quantified self" movement. Early accelerometer-based devices (actigraphy), used in clinical research, showed that movement could be a proxy for sleep-wake cycles. Consumer tech companies rapidly adopted and refined this technology, embedding it into wearable wristbands and smartwatches. Almost overnight, the powerful, complex data of the sleep lab was translated into a simple, nightly report on a personal device.

The adoption has been staggering. Research indicates about 30% of American adults use a wearable device for health data, and sleep is a primary tracking behavior. A geographically representative study found that 26% of U.S. respondents use a smartphone or wearable specifically to track their sleep. This aligns with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC) "Healthy People" goals, which include a call for technology to improve population health. Sleep tracking moved from a medical diagnostic tool to a mainstream wellness accessory.

The Allure of the Dashboard: Why We Track

The motivations for tracking sleep are as varied as the users:

• The Optimizer: Individuals seeking peak performance in athletics, business, or cognitive function see sleep as a key variable to tune.
• The Concerned: Those who feel perpetually tired or unrefreshed use trackers to find evidence and patterns for their subjective experience.
• The Curious: A general interest in self-knowledge and bio-data drives exploration of personal rhythms.
• The Diagnostician: People suspecting a sleep disorder, such as sleep apnea or insomnia, may use a tracker as a first step before (or sometimes instead of) seeking professional help.

This last point is crucial. For many, the sleep tracker acts as a gateway to health awareness. It can provide tangible, if imperfect, evidence that something is amiss—showing frequent awakenings, low blood oxygen saturation, or inconsistent sleep schedules. As one expert notes, for people who don't prioritize sleep, "a sleep tracker is a really good thing to point that out to you".

The Data We Trust (And What It Measures)

Modern sleep trackers present a dashboard of metrics that sound convincingly clinical:

• Total Sleep Time: The holy grail, measured against the canonical 7-9 hour recommendation.
• Sleep Stages: Breakdowns of time spent in Light, Deep (Slow-Wave), and REM sleep, often with idealized percentage targets.
• Sleep Score: A proprietary, composite number (often out of 100) that grades the night's sleep.
• Restlessness/Awakenings: An estimate of how many times you moved or were awake.
• Latency: How long it took to fall asleep.
• Biomarkers: Advanced devices may also track heart rate variability (HRV), resting heart rate, and respiratory rate during sleep.

This data is persuasive. It’s numerical, objective-seeming, and presented with the authority of technology. It creates a narrative about your night that can feel more real than your own foggy memory. As we will see, this transfer of narrative authority from subjective feeling to objective data is the fertile ground in which orthosomnia takes root. The stage is set for a powerful psychological phenomenon where the measurement itself begins to change the thing being measured.

What is Orthosomnia? Defining the Modern Sleep Obsession

The term "orthosomnia" entered the medical lexicon in 2017, when Dr. Kelly Glazer Baron and her colleagues published a case report examining a troubling trend in their sleep clinic. They described patients whose preoccupation with achieving perfect data from their wearable sleep trackers was actually worsening their sleep and causing significant distress.

The researchers chose the name deliberately, drawing a parallel to orthorexia nervosa, an eating disorder characterized by an unhealthy obsession with "correct" or "pure" eating. In orthosomnia, the obsession shifts from food to sleep metrics. The core of the condition is not merely using a tracker, but developing a maladaptive, perfectionistic quest for optimal sleep as defined by the device's output.

Orthosomnia vs. Insomnia: A Critical Distinction

It is essential to differentiate orthosomnia from insomnia, as they can coexist and fuel each other, but are fundamentally different.

• Insomnia is a clinically diagnosed sleep disorder. Its primary symptoms are persistent difficulty falling asleep, staying asleep, or waking up too early, despite having adequate opportunity for sleep. These difficulties must cause significant daytime impairment and occur at least three nights per week for three months. Insomnia is about the process and experience of disrupted sleep.
• Orthosomnia is not a formal sleep disorder diagnosis. It is a behavioral pattern and a preoccupation. It is defined by an excessive focus on and trust in sleep tracker data, and the anxiety that arises from trying to "fix" that data. Orthosomnia is about the interpretation and significance of the data about sleep.

A person can have insomnia without orthosomnia (suffering from poor sleep without tracking it). A person can also have orthosomnia without a clinical insomnia disorder (becoming anxious over tracker data even when they are sleeping fairly well). Most problematically, they can have both, where the anxiety and behaviors driven by orthosomnia (like spending excessive time in bed) actively worsen underlying insomnia.

The Hallmarks of Orthosomnia: Symptoms and Behaviors

Since orthosomnia is an emerging concept, there is no official checklist of symptoms. However, based on clinical observations and case studies, key signs include:

1. Excessive Trust in Device Data: Placing greater faith in the sleep tracker's report than in one's own subjective feeling of rest or even in professional medical assessments. In one cited case, a patient remained deeply concerned about poor sleep based on her Fitbit data, even after a clinical polysomnogram showed she had slept deeply.
2. Preoccupation with "Perfect" Scores: The pursuit becomes about optimizing numbers (e.g., hitting a specific sleep score, achieving 20% deep sleep) rather than pursuing the felt sense of being rested.
3. Behavioral Changes to "Game" the Data: Altering behavior not to improve actual sleep quality, but to improve the tracker's readout. The most common example is spending excessive time in bed to increase the "total sleep time" metric, a behavior observed in the initial case studies. This can ironically lead to more fragmented, lighter sleep.
4. Significant Anxiety and Mood Disturbance: Feeling stressed, anxious, or defeated upon viewing "poor" data. This anxiety often centers around bedtime, creating a performance anxiety about the need to "succeed" at sleeping.
5. Daytime Impact: The anxiety can spill over into the day, causing irritability, fatigue, and problems with concentration—symptoms that may be misinterpreted as purely from poor sleep, when they are partly fueled by worry about sleep.

As one sleep expert frames it, the critical self-inquiry is: "How does your sleep data make you feel? Does your tracker make you feel worse about your sleep than you felt before?". If the answer is yes, it signals that the tool has shifted from an informative guide to a source of stress—the hallmark of orthosomnia. This obsession creates a mental hyperarousal that is the direct enemy of sleep's necessary surrender, a concept deeply rooted in the science of sleep reactivity, which we will explore next.

The Anxious Mind and the Sleeping Brain: The Science of Sleep Reactivity

To understand why sleep tracking can be so uniquely triggering, we must delve into the established science of how anxiety and sleep interact. This relationship is not merely one of inconvenience; it is a deeply wired, bidirectional conflict within our neurobiology. The concept of sleep reactivity provides the perfect lens to examine this.

What is Sleep Reactivity?

Sleep reactivity is defined as the trait-like degree to which an individual's sleep is disrupted by stress. Imagine stress as a wave. A person with low sleep reactivity is like a sturdy sea wall—the wave hits, but their sleep system remains largely intact. A person with high sleep reactivity is like a vulnerable shoreline—even a modest wave of stress causes significant erosion of their sleep.

Research shows this reactivity is influenced by genetics, family history of insomnia, gender (with women often showing higher reactivity), and environmental factors. When stress hits, individuals with high sleep reactivity experience drastic deterioration in their ability to fall and stay asleep. This trait is a key predictor of who will develop chronic insomnia disorder following stressful life events.

The Neurobiology of a "Hyperaroused" System

Why does this happen? The sleeping brain requires a state of quiescence and reduced arousal. The anxious mind, in contrast, is in a state of hyperarousal. This isn't just a metaphor; it involves measurable physiological systems:

• The Autonomic Nervous System: Anxiety activates the sympathetic "fight-or-flight" branch (increasing heart rate, blood pressure, and alertness), while suppressing the parasympathetic "rest-and-digest" branch needed for sleep.
• The Hypothalamic-Pituitary-Adrenal (HPA) Axis: Stress triggers the release of cortisol, a hormone that promotes alertness and can directly inhibit sleep processes.
• Cortical Networks: The cognitive rumination and worry associated with anxiety keep the brain's higher-order thinking centers active, preventing the descent into sleep.

In individuals with high sleep reactivity, these systems are primed to overreact to perceived threats. The mind becomes an internal stressor, and the bed becomes a battlefield where the need for sleep fights against a brain that believes it needs to stay on guard.

Where Sleep Tracking Enters the Battlefield

This is where the sleep tracker transforms from a passive observer into an active participant in the stress cycle. For the sleep-reactive individual:

1. The Tracker Becomes the Stressor: The device itself, and the anticipation of its morning verdict, becomes a source of anticipatory anxiety. "Will I score well tonight?" is a cognitive stressor that can activate the very hyperarousal it seeks to measure.
2. Data Fuels Rumination: A "bad" score provides concrete fodder for the worried mind to chew on. "Why was my deep sleep low? What did I do wrong? I have to fix this tonight." This pre-sleep rumination is a known exploit of sensitive sleep systems, augmenting their pathological reactivity.
3. It Creates a Performance Anxiety Loop: Sleep is an involuntary, passive process. You cannot will yourself to sleep any more than you can will your heart to stop. However, by framing sleep with scores and grades, trackers implicitly turn it into a performance to be achieved. The pressure to perform is a potent anxiety trigger, pushing sleep further out of reach. As neurologist Dr. W. Christopher Winter states, "Anxiety is designed to at least temporarily trump sleep... A lot of times, people who are anxious about sleep [get] pushed away from sleep rather than towards it".

In this light, orthosomnia can be seen as a technology-amplified form of high sleep reactivity. The tracker provides a constant, quantifiable source of sleep-related stress, feeding the hyperarousal of individuals who are already predisposed to have their sleep disrupted by worry. It creates a perfect, self-sustaining storm: worry about sleep leads to poor sleep data, which leads to more worry. To break this cycle, we must confront a foundational question: How much can we truly trust the data at the center of this storm?

The Accuracy Paradox: How Much Can We Really Trust Our Sleep Data?

The authority of the sleep tracker—and by extension, the anxiety of orthosomnia—rests on a fundamental assumption: that the data it provides is accurate and meaningful. But what if this foundation is shakier than we assume? An examination of the research reveals a significant accuracy paradox: the more detailed the data claim, the less reliable it tends to be.

The Gold Standard vs. The Consumer Device

The benchmark for sleep measurement is the in-lab polysomnogram (PSG). It uses electroencephalography (EEG) to directly measure brain wave activity, which is the only definitive way to distinguish between wakefulness, light sleep, deep sleep, and REM sleep.

Consumer wearables take a different, indirect approach. They primarily use accelerometers to detect movement (actigraphy), often combined with optical heart rate sensors, and sometimes temperature or pulse oximetry. Sophisticated algorithms then interpret these signals to infer sleep stages.

What the Research Says About Accuracy

Systematic reviews and studies consistently show a pattern:

• Good at the Basics, Poor on Details: Devices have become reasonably good at estimating total time spent in bed and the binary distinction of "sleep" vs. "wake" over the course of a night. A 2019 analysis confirmed this, finding reliability in estimating total sleep and time in bed.
• Struggling with Sleep Stages: Where devices falter significantly is in breaking down sleep into specific stages. The same 2019 analysis found even newer-generation trackers were only moderately successful at determining sleep stages. A 2021 study put a precise number on it, finding a popular wrist tracker accurately identified deep sleep only 59% of the time.
• Missing Wakefulness: A core issue is that trackers often mistake quiet wakefulness for sleep. A 2019 study in Sensors found devices had "difficulty detecting participants' wake periods," which directly skewed their estimates of total sleep time and quality. If you lie still in bed worrying, your tracker may very well log that time as "light sleep."

The Problem of the "Sleep Score"

The composite "Sleep Score" or "Sleep Quality" number is a particular source of potential misunderstanding. This score is not a scientific measurement but a proprietary algorithm created by the device manufacturer. It weights various metrics (time, stages, restlessness, HRV) in a black box to produce a simple grade.

The danger, as sleep psychologist Dr. Kelly Baron points out, is that "grading your sleep doesn't really make sense in the first place". There is no universally "perfect" sleep architecture. The ideal amount of deep or REM sleep varies significantly by age, genetics, and recent physical or mental activity. Chasing a predefined score ignores this deeply personal biology.

Smartphone Apps: An Even Weaker Link

It's also important to note that smartphone-based sleep tracking apps, which use the phone's microphone or accelerometer placed on the mattress, are considered by researchers to be currently inaccurate and ineffective for detailed sleep analysis. They lack the physiological sensors needed for reliable inference.

The Consequence: A Crisis of Misplaced Trust

This accuracy gap has direct consequences for orthosomnia:

1. Anxiety Over Inaccurate Data: People experience stress and engage in corrective behaviors based on information that may be fundamentally flawed. They are trying to "fix" a problem that may not exist as portrayed.
2. Misguided Behavioral Changes: As seen in the original orthosomnia cases, patients spent excessive time in bed to boost a "total sleep" metric that may have been underestimating their actual sleep due to the device's limitations.
3. Erosion of Body Awareness: Over-reliance on the device can teach us to distrust our own subjective sense of "feeling rested." As one expert warns, we risk becoming distracted from "tuning in and being guided by the intelligence of their own body".

The tracker presents itself as an oracle of truth, but it is, at best, a sketch artist drawing conclusions from shadows. When we base our emotional well-being and nightly rituals on these sketches, we set ourselves up for unnecessary distress. This begs the question: if the data is imperfect, what is the real, human cost of this obsession with perfect numbers?

The Vicious Cycle: How Tracking Fuels Anxiety and Anxiety Ruins Sleep

The relationship between sleep and anxiety is not a linear one-way street; it is a self-reinforcing, bidirectional cycle. Poor sleep worsens anxiety, and heightened anxiety makes sleep elusive. Sleep tracking, when used with a perfectionistic mindset, doesn't just observe this cycle—it actively pours fuel on the fire, creating a high-tech feedback loop of distress.

The Established Anxiety-Sleep Loop

Clinical research clearly establishes the two-way link:

• Anxiety → Sleep Loss: The hyperarousal of anxiety—racing thoughts, muscle tension, a sense of dread—is physiologically and psychologically incompatible with sleep onset. Studies find that over 90% of people with combat-related PTSD report insomnia symptoms. Anxiety disorders create a state of high "sleep reactivity," making individuals far more likely to experience sleep disruption under stress.
• Sleep Loss → Anxiety: Sleep deprivation doesn't just make you tired; it destabilizes emotional regulation. The brain's amygdala (the fear center) becomes more reactive, while the prefrontal cortex (which governs rational thought and emotional control) is impaired. Research indicates that sleep deprivation can instigate or worsen anxiety disorders, and people prone to anxiety are especially sensitive to this effect.

How the Tracker Intensifies the Loop

The sleep tracker inserts itself into every phase of this loop, amplifying the stakes and the stress.

1. The Pre-Sleep Phase: Performance Anxiety

• The Scenario: As you prepare for bed, you're aware the "test" is coming. The goal is no longer simply to rest, but to achieve a target score or improve on last night's "poor" data.
• The Effect: This transforms the bed from a sanctuary into a stage for performance. The pressure to sleep (an involuntary act) creates what's known as "sleep effort," which generates psychic tension. As one sleep physician notes, this anxiety "trump[s] sleep" and pushes you away from it. The tracker has created a new daily stressor directly linked to the sleep period.

2. The Post-Sleep Phase: Morning Dread and Misattribution

• The Scenario: You wake up and immediately check your device. A 2024 study on sleep app usage highlights how this data becomes the first input of the day. The number you see directly shapes your attribution—your explanation for how you will feel.
• The Powerful "Nocebo" Effect: A seminal 2018 study in the Journal of Sleep Research perfectly demonstrates this. Researchers gave adults with insomnia fake feedback from their trackers. Those told they slept poorly reported lower daytime alertness and greater sleepiness, while those told they slept well reported better mood and alertness—even though there was no actual difference in their sleep. The data didn't describe their reality; it dictated it.
• The Effect: A low score sets a negative cognitive frame for the entire day. You may attribute normal tiredness or challenges to "bad sleep," reinforcing a belief in your sleep insufficiency. This primes more anxiety for the next night.

3. The Behavioral Phase: Counterproductive "Fix-Its"

• Orthosomnia drives people to change behavior to improve metrics, not necessarily sleep quality. The most common is extending time in bed.
• The Effect: Spending more than 7-9 hours in bed (unless you genuinely need it) leads to more fragmented, shallow sleep. It weakens the powerful association between bed and solid sleep, a core principle of insomnia treatment. You are trying to solve a problem with a behavior that may be creating it.

The New, Tech-Driven Cycle

Thus, the traditional anxiety-sleep loop evolves into a more pernicious, data-driven cycle:
View "Bad" Data → Experience Anxiety & Rumination → Engage in Counterproductive "Fixing" Behaviors → Experience Worse or More Anxious Sleep → Tracker Records "Bad" Data (or misinterprets anxiety as poor sleep) → Repeat.

This cycle traps the user. The very tool purchased to gain control and insight becomes the engine of a loss of control and distorted insight. The path out of this maze requires a fundamental shift in perspective—from being a slave to the data to becoming an informed interpreter of it. This begins with recognizing that you are not alone, and that the design of these devices and the culture around them actively play into this dynamic.

The Psychology of the Perfect Score: When Wellness Becomes an Obsession

To fully grasp why a simple number on a screen can wield such power over our emotions and behaviors, we must look beyond sleep science and into the realms of psychology and behavioral design. The obsession with a perfect sleep score is not an accidental byproduct; it is a phenomenon nurtured by deep-seated cognitive biases and the very architecture of the technology we use.

The Perfectionism Trap

At its heart, orthosomnia is a form of perfectionism applied to a biological process. Perfectionism is often mischaracterized as a positive trait—a drive for excellence. In reality, clinical perfectionism is characterized by:

• Rigid, Unrealistic Standards: The belief that anything less than "perfect" (e.g., a 90+ sleep score, 2 hours of deep sleep) is a failure.
• Self-Worth Contingent on Performance: Basing your sense of being "healthy" or "good" on achieving these numeric targets.
• All-or-Nothing Thinking: Viewing a night with 6.5 hours of sleep as a total failure, rather than a minor deviation from an average.

Sleep is inherently variable. It fluctuates with stress, diet, exercise, illness, and the natural rhythms of life. Imposing rigid, perfectionist standards on this variable system is a recipe for chronic dissatisfaction and anxiety. The term "orthosomnia" was coined precisely because this "unhealthy preoccupation with perfect sleep" mirrors the dysfunctional relationship with food seen in orthorexia.

Gamification and Behavioral Design

Wearable companies are masters of gamification—using game-like elements (points, scores, badges, streaks) to engage users. This is powerful for motivation but dangerous when applied to health.

• The Score as a Reward/Punishment: The morning score becomes a daily report card. A high score delivers a dopamine hit of success; a low score feels like a punishment.
• Loss Aversion and Streaks: The desire to "not break the chain" of good sleep scores can create anxiety. You're not just sleeping; you're defending a streak.
• Social Comparison: Some platforms allow sharing scores, turning a personal biological function into a subtle (or not-so-subtle) competition.

This design brilliantly fosters engagement and habit formation, but it also externalizes motivation and simplifies complexity. It reduces the rich, subjective experience of restorative sleep to a single, game-able number.

The Illusion of Control and Predictive Anxiety

Humans have a fundamental desire to predict and control their environment, especially regarding health. Sleep trackers offer a tantalizing promise of control. "If I can measure it, I can manage it."

• The Illusion: The dashboard creates a sense that sleep is a system of levers to be pulled (go to bed earlier, avoid alcohol, etc.). While behaviors influence sleep, they do not guarantee a specific outcome.
• Predictive Anxiety: This desired control flips into anxiety when the data predicts a bad day. Seeing a low score, you predict you'll be tired and unproductive. This prediction then becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy through the nocebo effect and altered behavior.

The Neglect of Subjective Experience

Perhaps the most significant psychological cost is the erosion of interoceptive awareness—the ability to perceive and trust the signals from your own body.

• The Question: Do you feel rested, or does the tracker say you're rested? In cases of orthosomnia, the device's data overrides the individual's felt sense.
• The Expert View: Dr. Elizabeth Klerman, a professor of neurology at Harvard Medical School, argues for simpler, more subjective metrics: "Can you wake up without an alarm clock? Make it through the day without feeling exhausted or drinking five cups of coffee? To me, those are probably much more useful metrics".

By outsourcing the judgment of our sleep to a device, we become less attuned to our own needs. We might ignore a morning of feeling great because the score was "only" 75, or we might feel compelled to nap when we're energetic because the tracker shows a "sleep debt."

The psychology of the perfect score reveals that orthosomnia is more than a sleep issue; it is a technology-mediated issue of misplaced values, externalized validation, and the human struggle to accept natural biological variance. To heal this relationship, we must learn to use the tool without letting it use us. This starts with adopting strategies to break the cycle of obsession, which we will explore in the final section of this portion.

Who is Most at Risk? Identifying Vulnerability to Orthosomnia

Orthosomnia does not affect all sleep tracker users equally. Certain pre-existing psychological profiles, sleep patterns, and even beliefs about technology can significantly increase an individual's vulnerability. Understanding these risk factors is crucial for both self-awareness and for clinicians who encounter patients presenting with sleep-related anxiety.

1. Individuals with Pre-Existing Anxiety or Perfectionist Tendencies

This is the most significant risk group. The tracker becomes a new focal point for existing anxious or perfectionist patterns.

• Generalized Anxiety & High Sleep Reactivity: People with generalized anxiety disorder or those with a trait of high sleep reactivity—whose sleep is easily disrupted by stress—are primed to respond poorly to the stress of performance monitoring. The tracker provides a constant, measurable source of sleep-related worry.
• Clinical Perfectionism: Those who tie their self-worth to achievement and hold themselves to rigid, unrealistic standards are likely to apply this framework to sleep scores. The pursuit of the "perfect 100" becomes another arena for self-criticism and striving.
• Health Anxiety: Individuals prone to health anxiety (formerly hypochondriasis) may interpret normal fluctuations in sleep data as signs of a serious disorder, leading to excessive research, doctor visits, and bedtime anxiety.

2. People with Existing Insomnia or Sleep Complaints

Ironically, those who seek out trackers to solve a sleep problem are often at higher risk of developing orthosomnia.

• The Search for Evidence: Someone struggling with insomnia may use the tracker to validate their experience or find a "smoking gun." However, the inaccuracy in detecting wakefulness can sometimes show more (or less) disruption than is subjectively felt, creating confusion and mistrust in one's own perception.
• Increased Vigilance: Insomnia is often maintained by hypervigilance—an excessive focus on sleep and its consequences. The tracker feeds this vigilance with nightly data, reinforcing the idea that sleep is a problem that must be scrutinized.
• Case Study Insight: The original 2017 paper on orthosomnia described cases where patients' preoccupation with tracker data impeded their recovery from insomnia, even during treatment.

3. The "Quantified Self" Enthusiast with Low Trust in Subjective Feeling

This group is defined by a strong belief in data over intuition.

• Tech-Optimism: An unwavering faith in technology as an objective arbiter of truth. The phrase "the data doesn't lie" is a core belief, despite evidence that consumer sleep data can be misleading.
• Distrust of Bodily Signals: A tendency to dismiss or override subjective feelings (e.g., "I feel fine") if they contradict the data (e.g., "but my HRV is low"). This disconnection from interoceptive awareness is a key maintaining factor for orthosomnia.

4. Individuals in High-Performance or Competitive Fields

• Athletes, Executives, Biohackers: For those whose livelihood or identity is tied to performance, sleep is framed as a key "bio-metric" to optimize. The pressure to extract every possible percent of advantage can lead to an obsessive, numbers-driven approach that discounts holistic well-being.
• Social Comparison: In environments where tracking is common, comparing scores can add a layer of social competition and anxiety.

Recognizing the Warning Signs: A Self-Assessment

You might be vulnerable to or experiencing orthosomnia if you identify with several of the following statements:

• I feel anxious or disappointed when I see a low sleep score.
• I often change my daytime plans based on how I slept, according to my tracker.
• I spend more time in bed than I feel I need, hoping to increase my "sleep duration" metric.
• I trust my sleep tracker's report more than my own feeling of being rested or tired.
• I frequently research how to improve specific metrics (like deep sleep or HRV).
• Thinking about my sleep data makes it harder for me to fall asleep.
• If my tracker broke, I would feel anxious about not being able to monitor my sleep.

Recognizing these vulnerabilities and warning signs is the first step toward developing a healthier relationship with sleep tracking. It allows for a shift from passive consumption of data to active, mindful interpretation. In the next section, we will begin to outline the principles for making this shift and breaking the orthosomnia cycle.

Breaking the Cycle: First Steps Toward a Healthier Relationship with Sleep Data

If you recognize elements of orthosomnia in your own behavior, the goal is not to demonize technology or abandon the desire for good sleep. The goal is to dethrone the data and return yourself to the center of your sleep experience. This involves a conscious recalibration of how you use your tracker and how you interpret its information. Here are foundational first steps, drawn from expert recommendations and behavioral psychology.

1. Conduct a "Tracker Detox" Experiment

The most powerful intervention is often the simplest: take a break.

• The Action: Put your wearable in a drawer for two full weeks. Charge it and leave it.
• The Purpose: This break serves multiple functions:
  
  • Breaks the Feedback Loop: It removes the daily source of anxiety (the score) and the morning ritual of data-checking.
  • Rebuilds Interoceptive Awareness: It forces you to tune back into your body. How do you feel when you wake up? What is your energy level at 3 PM? You must rely on internal cues, not external numbers.
  • Provides Perspective: After the break, you can assess: Was I less anxious about sleep without it? Did my sleep actually get worse, or did it stay the same or even improve?
• Expert Support: Dr. Kelly Baron, who coined "orthosomnia," suggests this directly: "Taking a break can help you evaluate whether or not that tracker was actually helpful".

2. Reframe Your Morning Routine: Feelings Before Figures

If you choose to continue using a tracker, change the order of operations.

• The Old Way: Wake up → Check tracker → Let data dictate your mood and expectations.
• The New Way: Wake up → Pause and assess how you feel (without a number) → Go about the first hour of your day → Then, if you wish, look at the data with curiosity, not judgment.
• The Purpose: This practice re-establishes subjective experience as the primary metric. The data becomes a secondary piece of information to be curious about, not a verdict. As suggested by Harvard experts, "Start your day, decide how you feel, and then look at your sleep tracker".

3. Shift from Nightly Scores to Long-Term Trends

Change what you are looking for in the data.

• The Problem: Fixating on last night's score is like judging your fitness by a single workout. It's noisy and prone to distortion.
• The Solution: Use the tracker's weekly or monthly view. Look for patterns and trends, not nightly grades.
  
  • Ask Trend-Based Questions: "Is my average sleep time gradually increasing since I started a new wind-down routine?" "Do I see more restlessness on nights I have alcohol?"
  • Ignore the Outliers: A few "bad" nights in a month of otherwise stable sleep is normal. Our biology is not a machine.
• Expert Support: Baron emphasizes that long-term trends help you understand your unique sleep baseline and notice meaningful deviations, rather than stressing over normal night-to-night variation.

4. Demystify the Metrics and Accept Limitations

Educate yourself on what the device can and cannot do.

• Learn the Limits: Understand that sleep stage data is an estimate, not a measurement. Deep sleep accuracy can be as low as 59%. The device cannot measure brain waves.
• Question the "Perfect" Targets: Know that there is no universally perfect sleep architecture. The "ideal" 25% deep sleep is a guideline, not a law. Your ideal amount is personal.
• Use Data as a Conversation Starter, Not a Conclusion: If you see a concerning long-term trend (e.g., consistently low blood oxygen), use it as a reason to talk to a doctor, not to self-diagnose. As one expert says, viewing raw tracker data without context is like trying to interpret a raw MRI image by yourself.

5. Re-Emphasize Foundational Sleep Hygiene

Redirect the energy spent fixating on data toward evidence-based behaviors that actually improve sleep.

• Focus on Basics: Consistent sleep/wake times, a dark/cool/quiet bedroom, limiting evening screen time and caffeine, and managing daytime stress.
• The Tracker as a Helper, Not a Judge: Use the tracker only to monitor one simple, behavioral metric you're working on—like your bedtime consistency—not your overall "sleep quality."

These first steps are about regaining a sense of agency. They move you from a passive consumer of a sleep score to an active, mindful interpreter of information in the context of your own life. For some, this shift is enough. For others, where anxiety and poor sleep are deeply entrenched, a

‍

Citations:

Your Trusted Sleep Advocate: Sleep Foundation — https://www.sleepfoundation.org

Discover a digital archive of scholarly articles: NIH — https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/

39 million citations for biomedical literature :PubMed — https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/

Experts at Harvard Health Publishing covering a variety of health topics — https://www.health.harvard.edu/blog/  

Every life deserves world class care :Cleveland Clinic - https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health

Wearable technology and the future of predictive health monitoring :MIT Technology Review — https://www.technologyreview.com/

Dedicated to the well-being of all people and guided by science :World Health Organization — https://www.who.int/news-room/

Psychological science and knowledge to benefit society and improve lives. :APA — https://www.apa.org/monitor/

Cutting-edge insights on human longevity and peak performance:

 Lifespan Research — https://www.lifespan.io/

Global authority on exercise physiology, sports performance, and human recovery:

 American College of Sports Medicine — https://www.acsm.org/

Neuroscience-driven guidance for better focus, sleep, and mental clarity:

 Stanford Human Performance Lab — https://humanperformance.stanford.edu/

Evidence-based psychology and mind–body wellness resources:

 Mayo Clinic — https://www.mayoclinic.org/healthy-lifestyle/

Data-backed research on emotional wellbeing, stress biology, and resilience:

 American Institute of Stress — https://www.stress.org/

‍